Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 12:12
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
CM Punk makes John Cena’s WWE title reign interesting by delivering the Truth - Cageside Seats
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Want $8,665 A Year In Passive Income, Invest $25,000 In These High Yield Stocks - 24/7 Wall St.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
The Universe's Largest Map Has Arrived, And You Can Stargaze Like Never Before - ScienceAlert
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What is a good alternative to the Nike Zoom Pegasus Turbo for running on asphalt and concrete?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Make-A-Wish helps Tacoma cancer patient fulfill dream of giving back to fellow children - KOMO
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
This Chinese Spacecraft Is Traveling to One of Earth’s Quasi-Moons - WIRED